Sunday 6 November 2016

Blade Runners

                                

                           Blade Runner                                 

   
Date of Release: November 9th, 1982
 Directed by: Ridley Scott
 Starring: Harrison Ford, Sean Young, Rutger Hauer
Screenwriter: Hampton Fancher, David Peoples
 Runtime: 117 Minutes


Trailer:



                                  
                    

Review:



When the movie begins you are left pretty confused with what's going on. You see this guy named Leon (whom you later find out is a "replicant") shoots what seems like a good guy for no apparent reason. In comes the loveable antihero: Harrison Ford as Deckard. He gets interrupted before he can eat his food since his old boss is calling him up. We later find out that Nelson; the man who was blasted through a wall for asking the wrong questions to the wrong guy; is a blade runner. These blade runners are tasked with "retiring" replicants. Leon is among the 4 that escaped and Deckard must track down and eliminate them. 



This group includes an even more dangerous Roy Batty, a special Nexus 6 model repilcant, and the leader of the pack. He appears to be more perfect in every way than an ordinary human but has a 4 year kill switch. He has come back to see his creator/father Eldon Tyrell to become immortal; With a longer life he is basically like a God. Roy is in the Uncanny Valley, a term which we will discuss later on. As a Nexus 6 he is one of the closest replicants of a human in terms of actions, cognition and emotions.


The movie is set in a futuristic/post apocalyptic Los Angeles, heavily influenced by Japanese culture, with Japanese habitants, advertisements and signs. This suggests globalization of cultures, and Japanese rising as a prominent one (At the time Japan was likely seen as a very rising power) The sets of Blade Runner are gloomy: consistently dark rooms like that of Deckard's and J.F. Sebastian's. Many of the houses were large (the interior of J.F. Sebastian's seemed like it was very a very expensive house in the past) but very rundown. The sky was always pitch black and rainy, which could be explained as a result of the pollution. The use of neon and bright lights contrasting on the dark environment gave it a futuristic feel with a post apocalyptic feel.










There are only two scenes where we see high-key light: Tyrell's room and the ending scene where Roy dies. Tyrell's room is well lit and golden which depicts the situation of the current world: he is among the affluent who has thrived in this new world, whereas houses such as Leon's and Deckard's are dark, giving a feel of suffering in their life and being less fortunate. Tyerll is depicted as a very god-like person in this field: Being geographically (as well as figuratively) at the top of the pyramid, his well lit and golden home seeming heavenly in contrast to the other dark and murky settings. There was importance to the lighting at the ending scene as this was the first time we truly see any innocence or the good human side to Roy. As he dies Deckard realizes this too and it makes the audience pity Roy.All the other scenes are very dim to give a grim and dark mood. 


One of the themes is the typical scenario between humans and robots, shown through Replicants. Replicants were built to serve humans; humans get scared of how human-like they seem and are scared of their potential. In an attempt to understand what he's up against he goes to Eldon Tyrell's penthouse to see the beau Rachel. Rachel is not aware she is a replicant, which makes for an awkward situation. One failed test later and harshly breaking the news to her, Deckard is starting to have mixed feelings towards her


As Deckard encounters them one after the other, he starts to notice how human like these set of replicants are. When he kills Zhora, he has a moment when he is staring down at her body and feels remorse, and feels guilt for killing someone who seemed so human at the moment of death. Leon too expressed anger and seeked revenge when he attacked Deckard, later being killed by Rachel. 


The part where Roy encounters Eldon Tyrell was a bit shocking. In under 5 minutes, Roy and Eldon Tyrell have a father/son moment, and then Roy kisses Tyrell and gouges his eyes out. But there is a deep meaning to this scene. In essence Roy is finally meeting his master, but comes to find that the man he thought as an immortal god is an ordinary and flawed human. As he marvels at him as his creator and his genius (kisses him) he kills him as after talking to him feels he is beneath him and cannot help him any further. This also describes the idea of the Oedipus complex, which will be discussed below


By Roy saving Deckard at the end of the film, it shows the viewers that Roy is thinking and feeling as a human being does. This is by understanding how human life is important. Roy wanted someone to hear him out before he died so that he can “clear his conscience” and who better than his moral enemy. Roy life ends right after he says "I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die." (This ending quote makes you feel pity on Roy, as you realize how human he is, and that he has suffered so much in the past, and all he sought to do was live longer in peace with Pris, but the only way he knew of trying to accomplish this was through violence.


Character Analysis:




Deckard: 



Harrison Ford's portrayal of character of Deckard is interesting. Harrison Ford through his character interacted with little emotion to other characters and seemed to show little care to other characters at the beginning (ex: he showed little empathy at the beginning for Rachel when interviewing her and when he told her flatly she was not human). He later develops a deep connection with Rachel, perhaps in how he can relate to her not being entirely sure of her identity and cannot detect anything inhuman about her.




Rachel: 



Sean Young played her character Rachel well; her responses were short and seemed artificial and her movements and responses seemed robotic. Though she does show Rachel's hidden emotion very well with little details (the way she cries, the way she interacts with Deckard)


Roy Batty:




The way Rutger Hauer portrayed Roy is what truly kept the film interesting. He takes on this savior like persona to the replicants. Roy's character can be seen as a symbol of the prodigal son, the neglected one who returns to his father. In the film he is seen largely as a villain but towards the end you start to somewhat sympathize with him.


(1006 words)



Our Rating:


The performance by the characters were excellent. Harrison Ford was a great anti-hero, Sean Young interacted with the right amount of emotion, making her character conflicting between robot and human. Rutger truly brought Roy to life. The choice of lighting during the fighting scenes were good. Many sets were very dark which made it hard to follow but was necessary. They did an excellent job of creating this futuristic dystopian world. Some of the sounds added to the feel of a advanced but artificial world. It added to the gloom and darkness of many of the scenes, though at some times the diegetic sound effects seemed off and irritating to hear. We believe it is a great movie, but could only truly be enjoyed after a second watch with analysis of all the hidden symbols and meanings, and its deep and central idea of selfhood.

Course Connections:


There is this large question of selfhood, and the way that people feel (Deckard falling in love with Rachel) showing that if it is so hard to distinguish them is there a true need to deem them as not human. In Locke's theory of self, "a thinking intelligent being, that has reason and reflection, and can consider itself as itself, the same thinking thing, in different times and places” and continues to define personal identity simply as “the sameness of a rational being”(Locke). The Voigt-Kampff test serves to pinpoint Replicants, but when it fails to see that Rachel is a replicant at the same capacity, it shows how Rachel has achieved a selfhood so close to that of a real human being. She can think act in the same capacity as a human, and considers herself human, which seen through Deckard's relationship has shown she has achieved selfhood.


There is the idea of Uncanny Valley present in this film that we explored in class. Replicants became so human like to the point that it started to frighten other humans when they couldn't easily distinguish one apart from an ordinary human. But as we notice through Deckard in Rachel and Pris, we start to feel not so threatened by how similar they look, and start to feel more genuine feelings towards them: they have moved out of uncanny valley.


The Oedipus complex, as we explored in class, is developed as you are child. A result of the Oedipus complex is often developing either violent or sexual feelings towards one your parents (typically the one of the opposing gender). Since he was technically separated at birth, and Tyrell is viewed as a god by many, Roy felt a strong awe for Tyrell, which later culminated into an erotic feeling (kissed him in the scene).Later in the scene however, he finds that Tyrell is not as perfect and powerful as he seemed. When Tyrell explained how he had no control over his life now and couldn't change him, it made Roy see Tyrell as inferior. From this discovery and also out of spite, he kills Tyrell.




Questions:


Why wasn't Deckard killed by Roy?

If you find out a friend: someone who acts and thinks like a human and believes they are one, was a replicant, should it change the value of their self, if nothing else would change?

There is also an underlying question; is Deckard a replicant?





Works Cited:


Scott, R. (Director), Scott, R., & Francher, H. (Producers), & Francher, H., & Peoples, D. W. (Writers).(n.d.). Blade runner [Video file]


Ebert, R. (n.d.). Blade Runner Movie Review & Film Summary (1982) | Roger Ebert. Retrieved October 22, 2016, from http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/blade-runner-1982

"Blade Runner." IMDb. 1990, http;//www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658?ref_=rvi_tt. Accessed on October 22 2016.


Locke, John. "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding." Perry, John. Personal Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008. 33-52.

Unknown Author. Blade Runner Fandom:  Wiki, 2015, http://bladerunner.wikia.com/wiki/Themes_in_Blade_Runner




5 comments:

  1. Overall, your blog is very straightforward in explaining your thoughts and analysis of the film, which, in the case of such a complex film like Blade Runner, is rather refreshing. The paragraphs are split evenly so as not to tire the reader. One thing that can be improved, however, is the summary you have written for the film, because the character of Pris is not ever introduced properly, so it’s hard to know what role the character has played in the movie. Also, you describe the opening scenes in detail but glaze over the rest of the film (you do explain more of the film narrative in later paragraphs, so it seems like you incorporated your summary into the other sections of your blog). As I read your review, I couldn’t help but relate this film to the 2004 film I, Robot in my mind. The stories are very similar, and are both loosely adapted from literary works written decades ago. I, Robot, takes place decades from today, in a society where robots are commonplace and provide services for humans. One day, the top robotic engineer in the country is murdered mysteriously, and it is Will Smith’s character’s job to find the suspect. Throughout the film, we find out the engineer’s latest prototype, Sonny, a presumably self-aware robot, was the murderer, but Sonny killed his “master” because the latter asked him to. The audience starts off feeling the uncanny valley effect, but we slowly begin to empathize with Sonny and see him as more human than robot, because he was designed to dream and think, and just thinks exactly as a human would think. I don’t want to spoil the whole story; you should really watch it some time. You may find some aspects that connect to Blade Runner. (299)

    ReplyDelete
  2. As a whole, this blog is compelling to read.I think you're overall review of the film is very straightforward, and I think the creators of the blog did a great job at explaining the analysis of characters. I feel as though the "course connections" could be elaborated a little more (i.e the uncanny valley). I feel like a correction could have been elaborating and explaining what the uncanny valley is, and going into further depth and detail would have been effective, to the reader. i thought the connection of selfhood was very effective, as they explained the different thoughts and views of Locke, and how it related to the film. Overall, I really enjoyed the way your blog looked physically, with the paragraph spacing. This was a nice touch and made it less overwhelming for the reader. I also enjoyed the use of GIFS (moving pictures) this was a nice touch, and added an overall attraction to your blog. It also seems like you skimmed over a bit of the film, which you then answer later in later paragraphs. Overall, it was a well done blog; and actually made me want to watch this film on my free time. Though I don't really watch movies like this, therefore I don't really have connections I can make, this is evidently a perfect film to be seen for THIS class specifically. I believe that this film is fairly complex, and this group did a great job of making the content of the blog straightforward; and easy to follow along with.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This blog is very interesting to read and is very straight forward when it comes to explaining the analysis of the movie. Even doe the overall blog was fantastic to read I do think that could have been some improvement made on the course connections, mainly the one on the "Uncanny Valley" because it needed to be further explained. The class connection that was made towards Locke and the connection of self hood and how it was connected this movie. The GIFS were a nice touch to add some extra attraction to the blog. The overall look of the blog was very eye catching. Just because everything seemed to be properly placed and spaced out so that there was no add confusion to the blog of a movie that's already quite complex to try and understand. Overall this group did a fantastic job at making this blog easy to understand and very entertaining to read.

    ReplyDelete
  4. To answer your second question about finding out that one of your friend is a replicant, I tend to think that maybe yes its will change my way of thinking about this “person”. I, also, strongly believe that this will alternate their value of the definition of the self. This individual, even with memories, is not considered human anymore. The replicant’s memories are made up to make him believes that he is a real person, but in reality, it’s just a robot with thoughts.
    I presume that to have a self you have to possess your own memory. We are all considered as self-person, because we have memories in which we made mistakes and we learned from it, where we experience feelings proper to this type of situation. However, this thought lead to another question: what if you too are a replicant with an implanted memory?
    If this situation occurs to me, in maybe a near future, I will stay firm on my ideas that this “person” does not think, but is more programmed to think a certain way or to answer this way. I will count this replicant as a sentient creature, but not as a personhood only because a sentient individual can subjectively perceive the world by meaning of emotions and/or experiences while still not having a real self. To summarize my thought, in this situation, I will define my “friend” as a creature that can feel and interprets the outside world without having a real self. (250 words)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great blog guys! I enjoyed your use of GIFs and the simplicity of your writing style. It creates a personal and lively atmosphere for your blog. In response to your first question: I believe that Roy did not kill Deckard because he simply had no justifiable reason to. In other words, although Deckard happened to be the only one capable - according to his boss, Bryant - in retiring replicants, Roy already knew that all his fellow replicants were programmed to expire shortly. His encounter with one of his creators, Dr. Eldon Tyrell, proved this fact by explaining that making "an alteration in the evolvement of an organic life system is fatal; a coding sequence cannot be revised once it's been established". This signifies that whether or not Dr. Eldon Tyrell tried to fulfill their wish of a prolonged lifespan, their time of death hinders their initial desire by remaining where it stands: soon. Therefore, Roy did not see a point in eliminating Deckard so quickly when every replicant was doomed. It was only a matter of time, like Roy's time during his battle with Deckard.

    ReplyDelete