Blade Runner
Title of Film: Blade Runner
Year of Publication: 1982
Director: Ridley Scott
Screen-Writer: Hampton Fancher &
David Webb Peoples
Lead Actors: Harrison Ford (Rick
Deckard); Rutger Hauer (Roy Batty); Sean Young
(Rachael); Daryl Hannah (Pris); Brian
James (Lean Kowalski); Joanna
Cassidy (Zhora); Joe Turkel (Dr.
Eldon Tyrell); William Sanderson (J. F.
Sebastian); James Hong (Hannibal Chew);
Michael Emmet Walsh (Bryant)
Running Time: 1h57min.
Film Review
In the year 2019, in Los Angeles, California, a
group of replicants - beings virtually identical to humans - are utilized as
slaves in off-colonies, thanks to the Tyrell Corporation, who developed these
creatures in the first place. With such a short lifespan, a specific squad of
replicants by the name of "Nexus 6" rebels onto Earth to seek for
their creators in hopes to reprogram their "expiration" dates - their
day of death. Due to their illegal presence on this planet, Rick Deckard, a
blade runner - special police officer ordered to kill any trespassing replicant
upon detection - is pulled out of his retirement because he is, as a matter of
fact, the only one capable of eliminating these creatures. He, therefore,
conducts a series of investigations and tests in order to detect and
"retire" - kill - all remaining replicants. In the meanwhile, Dr.
Eldon Tyrell creates another experiment by the name of Rachael, who thinks
she's a human being, when in reality, she's an improved replicant implanted
with memories, which gives her the perspective of being real. Rick
Deckard eventually falls in love with Rachael, making his job slightly more
complex than it needs to be.
First
off, although the first scene, which was when a replicant kills an
interrogator, happened to be incomprehensible and quite confusing at first, the
plot itself was clear for us due to the added information scrolling through the
film to visually read before it started. In other words, it helped put us in
context of the current situation and also aided in the clarification
of what a "replicant" and what a "blade runner" is. It
also left us, and certainly other viewers, with room for questions and
assumptions about this movie.
When
it comes to the global setting of the film, it is represented
through a gloomy and futuristic environment, specifically in the year 2019, in
Los Angeles. We weren't able to physically perceive Los Angeles in this movie,
although it clearly stated it in the beginning. As a matter of fact, most of
the scenes were displayed in an overpopulated city, where it could easily be
mistaken for New York City because of all those electronic billboards. It also
displayed an area greatly influenced by the Asian culture, which may
symbolize knowledge and advanced technology (e.g. the use of flying cars) in
order to represent the future. The use of low-key lighting and
electronic music throughout most of the film also helped set a futuristic mood,
and a dark one as well, which portrayed the world in 2019 appropriately.
While
on the topic of non-diegetic sounds, the use of other types of
music playing during the movie benefitted in creating a dramatic effect through
certain scenes. For instance, in the scene were J. F. Sebastian invited Pris to
enter his home, a short mischievous background music began to foreshadow a
feeling that something harmful was about to happen later on in the film. There
is also the scene where Rachael played smooth classical music on the piano to
indirectly represent the innocence of her existence, where she couldn't
distinguish the truth between being a replicant or a human being. This type of
music provided us with a moment of nostalgia, contrasting the futuristic
environment of the entire movie. When it comes to diegetic sounds, we
disliked how some of the sound effects appeared fake (e.g. punches during
fights, gun shots, etc.) because it downgraded the realism of the actions being
committed.
The
sets constructed for this film compensated for the lack of realism. As a matter
of fact, we greatly appreciated the look of all the creators' homes, where
it grew in size to represent each creators' involvement in the creation of
replicants. For example, Cannibal's Chew's laboratory appeared bright-white,
cold, and small, which represents his participation of creating the eyes
of the replicants. J. F. Sebastian's home was a grand abandoned building,
representing his unexplainable creativeness in designing these
replicants. In addition, his house reflected a creepy wonderland
of fabricated toys, which portrays his lonesome and childish personality.
Lastly, Dr. Eldon Tyrell's heavenly mansion symbolized a replicant's mind,
which seems so complex and demanded for great knowledge and effort. His home
also displayed high-key lighting, which potentially gives us
the perspective of him being the "hero" of the film, in which Dr.
Eldon Tyrell was the only one capable of finding a solution to control these
replicants.
Cannibal Chew's Laboratory |
Dr. Eldon Tyrell's Home |
J. F. Sebastian's Home |
Although Dr. Eldon Tyrell played an important role
in this movie, only a few characters remained engraved on our minds such as:
Rick Deckard
Rick Deckard, known as Harrison Ford, played this
straightforward blade runner, with only one goal: to retire the remaining
replicants. He has been dragged out of his own retirement by his
former boss who convinced him that he was the only man for the job.
In this film, this character doesn't show much emotions, even when expressing
his feelings to Rachael, which could potentially explain why this interacting
appears more awkward than romantic. This also made us question the truth of his
existence because a lack of emotions is what differences human beings from
replicants.
When it comes to his
acting skills, we believe that he played a decent role for a main character.
Although he seemed quite neutral throughout the entire film, his physical
features were appropriate for a policeman.
Rachael
Rachael, also known as Sean Young, played this
innocent replicant, who strongly wished to be human, in our opinion. She seemed
afraid of feeling and accepting her emotions because she's inexperienced with
this aspect of life. In other words, we interpreted that her implanted memories
don't have any data of how to act in certain ways (e.g. how to kiss, how to
love, etc.). This actor therefore portrayed very well Rachael's torn decision
about the truth of own existence.
J. F. Sebastian
J. F. Sebastian
symbolized, in our opinion, the "odd" creator in this movie, which is
shown through his lonesome and advanced decrepitude lifestyle, surrounded by a
dark atmosphere. He appeared vulnerable when it comes to having company,
which might explain why he decided to help out his fellow creations, Roy and
Pris.
Roy Batty
Roy Batty, also known as Rutger Hauer, represented
the superior replicant in this film, where he is the perfect one.
He showed great knowledge, strength, and perseverance to maintain the lives of
the replicants a part of Nexus 6. He also demonstrated loyalty towards all
replicants by fighting for his life in order to find a solution to their main
problem: to prolong their lives.
He is, in our opinion, the
actor who played his role with such passion to a point where we could connect
with him, specifically by sensing his fear of dying. As he mentioned in the
movie, "to be a slave is the experience to live in fear", and Rutger
greatly reflected this through the way he delivered his lines, especially
the ones before his death.
Pris
Pris played a devious role by befriending J.
F. Sebastian. She also has a romantic involvement with Roy, which explains
why we perceived them as a power duo throughout the movie. They played
J. F. quite well to have the ability to convince him to help them out, despite
the fact that we all had a gut feeling of them stabbing him in the back
afterwards.
When it comes to
techniques used throughout this film, the director's use of dreams created a
mysterious illusion for the viewers, which might have impact us in a good or
bad manner (e.g. Rick Deckard's dream about a unicorn). As a matter of
fact, this technique left us room for self-interpretation.
The director's use of special effects (e.g.
explosions, camera angles, etc.) also left us questioning the meaning of
multiple scenes. For instance, the camera angles and side-lighting displayed in
the scene where Deckard is trying to find a way to escape from Roy
demonstrated, in our opinion, a "danger" zone and a "safe"
zone, where Deckard is torn between a life and death situation.
Lastly, despite this
film's initial vagueness, the theme of "Blade Runner" was always very
clear to us. In other words, we believe that the main theme displayed throughout
this movie is based on the evolution of robots.
1371 words
Quality of the Film
Blade Runner is considered as one of
the best fiction movies of all time. The movie contains many interesting themes
like personhood and what makes a person human and addresses them very well,
meaning that they were very well presented by having replicants. The actors
were well chosen, Harrison Ford who played Deckard acted as a emotionless human
which kind of made us doubt whether he was a replicant or not. And Sean Young
who played Rachael showed multiple emotions very well throughout the movie.
However, this movie had many weaknesses. The story was over detailed, meaning
that there was too much to pay attention too. We had to pay careful attention
to every detail because we could lose the understanding of a scene that would
explain to us another and it would confuse us very easily. Secondly, there was
a lot of background information missing, for example Deckard. It would have
been great if they would’ve put more deepness into his past to see why he was
the way he was and what made him be a blade runner to make us understand a bit
more his character and personality in the present.
Course Connections
Blade Runner emphasizes
the idea that replicants are not considered as real humans. We had a feeling
that by exterminating all the replicants from the Earth, they had no rights. In
other words, they are not granted personhood. At the beginning of the movie,
Rick Deckard, said that no matter what, replicants had to be killed. It didn't
even matter if they had done nothing bad. Replicants were a threat to humanity
and Rick Deckard had the job to kill them all. Bryant, Rick Deckard's boss,
didn't show a lot of respect for these AI, he was even calling them
"skin-jobs", which shows how much he hated them. They had no value
and they were basically nothing for him. We believe that replicants were not
granted personhood and because of that, they were portrayed as slaves.
Humans could do whatever they wanted with replicants. There is also another
important thing: they don't have "real" memories. Their memories are
implants. As a matter of fact, Rachael's memories were not hers, they were Dr.
Eldon Tyrol's niece's memories. Our memories are extremely important
because it makes us remember our past. when things are granted personhood, it is because
they are seen as sentient beings with a conscious. Our memories allow us to be
sentient and remember things that we experienced. Replicants had memories to
make them think that they were human beings, when in reality, it wasn't their
own memories. It was simply another way to control them.
Memory is a concept that is present throughout the
movie. A philosopher Locke, had this idea about our memories and that in a way,
it makes us who we are since we can recall many events of our life. It’s the
narrative part of ourselves and without memories; we wouldn’t be who we are
today. In Blade Runner, like we said before, Racheal has implants memories.
It’s not her memories but someone else so it makes her believe that she is
human because she can recall many memories that happened to her throughout her
life. After she learned that it wasn’t her memories, it made her doubt herself
because she doesn’t know who she is anymore, is she a replicant or a
human? Our memories are necessary for our personal identity, according to
Locke. Who are we without our memories? If we would learn that our memories
would be implanted, it would change our perceptions. We wouldn’t be the same
person anymore. It would make us question everything that we know or that we
had experienced.
Another important concept
is one of Descartes' quote, which is: "I am thinking so therefore I
am". The audience started to discover that J. F. Sebastian thought that
his replicants were his own toys, his possessions. He didn't value much about
replicants, despite the fact that he helped create them. Pris is the one
who stated: "I am thinking so therefore I am". In "Blade
Runner", replicants are viewed as slaves to their creators. In
other words, they belong to their masters, which explains why replicants
felt obliged to obey them. If they are thinking, they are having some
intellectual thoughts. They are more than just replicants. Thinking is an
individual essential "self". We certainly know ourselves that we
are always thinking.
Questions
- Is Deckard a replicant?
- Should a replicant be qualified to obtain
personhood? Why?
- How would you react if you found out that
your memories of childhood were fake? Why?
Elaboration of Themes and Contents
Blade Runner Insight. Chapman, Murray. What is
the signification of the unicorn? WEB. 1998. http://www.br-insight.com/significance-of-the-unicorn.
Accessed on November 5, 2016.
We thought that one of the important concepts of
the film was the unicorn. It was a hard concept to get but it was also super
interesting and an important part of the movie. It talks about how Rachael is
the representation of the unicorn, how unicorns are fascinating creatures and
how Racheal is a rare replicant. The fact that Rachael was the only replicant
that was able to show emotions made her very special and unique like a
unicorn.
Den of Geek!. Lambie, Ryan. How Ridley Scott’s
Recent Films Link to Blade Runner. WEB. December 16th, 2014. http://www.denofgeek.com/us/movies/ridley-scott/242170/how-ridley-scotts-recent-films-link-to-blade-runner
(Consulted on November 19th, 2016)
This article links many of Ridley Scott’s to Blade
Runner. He has produced many many movies in which futuristic and existential
themes were expressed in his movies. And helps us understand the themes showed
in Blade Runner.
Works Cited
"Blade Runner 30th Anniversary Trailer." YouTube, uploaded by Warner Bros. Home Entertainment, 6 September 2012, https;//www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYhJ7Mf2Oxs
"Blade Runner." IMDb. 1990, http;//www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658?ref_=rvi_tt. Accessed on October 22 2016.
Images:
Images:
Unknown Author. "Rick Deckard." The Quiet Front, 2013, http://www.thequietfront.com/home/2013/4/17/rick-deckard. Accessed on November 19 2016.
Unknown Author. "Blade Runner Three Decades Later: How a Masterpiece of Production Design Left Its Mark on Los Angeles (and Vice Versa)." Under the Hollywood Sign, 2010, https://underthehollywoodsign.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/blade_runner1.jpg. Accessed on November 19 2016.
Unknown Author. BladeZone: The Online Blade Runner Fan Club, 2001, http://media.bladezone.com/contents/film/production/Linda-DeScenna/chew_lab.jpg. Accessed on November 19 2016.
Peter Kenny. Under Another Sun, 2015, http://anothersun.blogspot.ca/2015/04/a-perfect-day-in-brighton.html. Accessed on November 19 2016
Unknown Author. "Mid-Week Match-Up: A Blade Runner-Inspired Room." Mirror 80, 2011, http://www.mirror80.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/BR-4.jpg. Accessed on November 19 2016
Warner Bros. ET, 2013, http://www.etonline.com/media/photo/2013/08/24032005/640_Sean_Young_Harrison_For.jpg. Accessed on November 20 2016
Warner Bros. Pyxzur, 1982, http://pyxurz.blogspot.ca/2011/10/blade-runner-page-3-of-6.html. Accessed on November 20 2016
Warner Bros. Star 2, 2016, http://www.star2.com/living/viewpoints/2016/02/21/booked-out-blade-runner-fan-finally-braves-the-philip-k-dick-book/. Accessed on November 20 2016
Unknown Author. Pinterest, Publication Date Unknown, https://www.pinterest.com/pin/9992430393797771/. Accessed on November 5 2016.
Unknown Author. SciFi Empire, Publication Date Unknown, http://scifiempire.net/wordpress/top-ten-the-fifth-element/blade-runner/. Accessed on November 5, 2016
Unknown Author. Giphy, Publication Date Unknown, http://gph.is/29hguBk. Accessed on November 19, 2016.
Unknown Author. Giphy, Publication Date Unknown, http://giphy.com/gifs/blade-runner-iUws0NJxrUwko. Accessed on November 19, 2016
Warner Bros. ET, 2013, http://www.etonline.com/media/photo/2013/08/24032005/640_Sean_Young_Harrison_For.jpg. Accessed on November 20 2016
Warner Bros. Pyxzur, 1982, http://pyxurz.blogspot.ca/2011/10/blade-runner-page-3-of-6.html. Accessed on November 20 2016
Warner Bros. Star 2, 2016, http://www.star2.com/living/viewpoints/2016/02/21/booked-out-blade-runner-fan-finally-braves-the-philip-k-dick-book/. Accessed on November 20 2016
Unknown Author. Pinterest, Publication Date Unknown, https://www.pinterest.com/pin/9992430393797771/. Accessed on November 5 2016.
Unknown Author. SciFi Empire, Publication Date Unknown, http://scifiempire.net/wordpress/top-ten-the-fifth-element/blade-runner/. Accessed on November 5, 2016
Unknown Author. Giphy, Publication Date Unknown, http://gph.is/29hguBk. Accessed on November 19, 2016.
Unknown Author. Giphy, Publication Date Unknown, http://giphy.com/gifs/blade-runner-iUws0NJxrUwko. Accessed on November 19, 2016
I think your blog on “Blade Runner” is really well made. It is clear to understand and it makes me want to watch the movie. I liked the visual presentation; it didn’t seem to be only text that would take forever to read. I find fascinating the fact that this movie explores a lot the concept of the self through Rachael since she is not human because she is a replicant but still has memories and actually thinks she is a human being, which means that she is aware of herself being a part of something even though she is not totally right. On top of that, the fact that her memories are implemented adds on the problem whether if she can be considered as having a self or not since they are not actually real, and it is another link with the class content. The memories we have are they actually something we do remember or are they only something we think we lived? For example, I have memories of me at the wedding of my uncle in a certain dress with my teddy bear in my arms when I was 2 years-old, but I also know that I saw a picture of that, so do I actually remember that day? I don’t think so but it still appears real to me and I have the impression that I do remember that day even though I probably don’t since I was too young. So I can really understand the struggle she is living since none of her memories are actually real. Overall, I think you did a great job. It was really interesting!
ReplyDeleteHi! I really enjoyed reading your blog. I have never seen Blade Runner before but I felt I gained a very good understanding of the movie by reading your review. They are some small grammatical changes that could be made to help the blog flow a bit better. I also found that the first two course connections were similar to each other and it was a bit difficult to understand the 3rd connection but that is my only critique. You chose excellent photos that were well placed throughout the blog to help visualize some complex points. I am intrigued by the concept of taking a real person's memories and given them to an A.I such as Rachael. You said they were taken from Dr. Tyrol's niece. How were they extracted? What happened to his niece afterwards? We studied various types of the self throughout this course. And while A.I. generally don't have independent thought while humans most certainly do, you explained well how gray this area can quickly become when the boundaries between humans and A.I. are crossed. I also liked the importance you placed on memories and the impact they have on us as people. Like Valerie, I have memories of myself when I was a child. For example, I have some of myself playing with my grandfather who died when I was a few years old. I am still unsure if I only create a memory based on the photo or if I have a real memory of him and the times we had together. This was a fun blog to read and respond to. Keep up the good work!
ReplyDelete